Association of Residents and Friends of Boipeba
The social mission of Amabo is to better the life of residents, while protecting the natural resources of Boipeba. |
|||||
|
|||||
e-mail: amabo@amabo.org.br |
|||||
General ObjectivesContribute to the social, cultural and economic development of the community, bettering the quality of life of residents, without putting the environment at risk. Collaborate in management of the Environmentally Protected Area of the Islands of Tinharé and Boipeba. Promote education in general, and specifically education about the environment. Look for solutions for basic sanitation problems (water, sewage, garbage). Promote Ecotourism and control the flow of tourism on the Island of Boipeba. Promote hands on education and training for jobs, using partnerships. Contribute to the preservation of the environment as well as preservation and recognition of local culture, customs and folklore. Promote artistic production, artisans, and cultural events. |
|||||
Sustainable Development of the Island of Boipeba |
|||||
In 1999/2000 the residents of Boipeba under the auspices of Amabo, conceived the idea of DESIBO, with the objective of bettering the lives of the local population, and developing economic activities, especially tourism, without putting the environment at risk. Consequently, the Island of Boipeba was chosen as a model area in SEBRAE´s Local Development Program. |
|||||
|
|||||
In the last few years, Environmental Education has become important as an instrument for mobilization and for society’s taking action, a result of gaining awareness about the causes and consequences of environmental dilemmas. The Federal Constitution refers to, in chapters about the environment, the obligation to promote public awareness in order to protect the environment, and the need to establish systematic programs of Environmental Education. In this way, Amabo would like to see the population of the Island of Boipeba raise their consciousness about environmental issues, and subsequently learn about the causes and the consequences of environmental abuse. In agreement with official environmental directives, we should consider the environment in its totality, and understand Environmental Education to be a path of continuous improvement, developing critical thinkers and a spirit of cooperation in the community, awakening abilities which can translate into initiatives, when searching for solutions to problems related to the environment. Amabo would like to contribute to a new perception of the world, taking action in a holistic way. The idea is to work together with the school system, local city officials, and state and federal offices, and not just cooperate with one specific program or government bureau. The current model of economic growth has generated enormous unbalance. On one hand, there has never been so much wealth and abundance, and on the other hand, environmental destruction, pollution, and poverty, are increasing daily. Given this reality, Sustainable Development emerges as an attempt to conciliate economic development with environmental preservation. To achieve Sustainable Development, the protection of the environment must be considered an integral part of the process of development, and can not be treated separately. Sustainable Development promotes generation and distribution of wealth, bettering the quality of life for all of the community, taking into consideration, however, the planet’s healthy environment. |
|||||
|
|||||
In partnership with the CRA – the Center for Environmental Resources, AMABO elaborated a synthesis of the Plan of Action, preparing written material for visitors and local residents of the Island of Boipeba. Being well-informed, local residents will be better equipped to understand the APA objectives, and will be able to participate in projects which attempt to identify and solve major problems on the island. Informed about the fragility of local ecosystems, visitors will be able to help in the preservation of the environment, as well as receive firsthand knowledge about local culture, local fauna, and local flora. |
|||||
Sustainable Development of Tourism |
|||||
|
|||||
Amabo proposes that investments in the area of tourism on the Island of Boipeba be made following the guidelines of National Ecotourism Policy set by the Ministries of Industry, Culture and Tourism, MICT, today the Ministry of Sport, Tourism and the Environment, MMA. They define Ecotourism as a “branch of tourism which makes use of, in a sustainable form, natural and cultural resources, stimulates its conservation, and looks to form an environmental consciousness, promoting the well-being of local populations.” |
|||||
|
|||||
In Brazil ecotourism is of extreme importance for both economic and social development. Making use of existing ecosystems will provide new economic alternatives, making for a better quality of life in the community. Ecotourism will also reduce some of the negative impact caused by traditional tourism with its large groups of tourists. Smaller groups of tourists will have different expectations and a different relationship to the environment. As such, controlling the flux of visitors and transportation, adopting parameters for implantation of infra-structures for tourism, and respecting and acknowledging the importance of local culture, are basic and indispensable conditions for the harmonious development of Ecotourism. |
|||||
Projects |
|||||
Amabo has been successful in implementing several projects, attempting to better the life of the local population while protecting Boipeba’s environment. The first projects were the Civic-Social Assistance Program with the Brazilian Navy, donations of medicine for the Public Health Clinic in Boipeba, and courses in motor boat mechanics, fish smoking techniques and boating – a joint effort with the Federal Center for Technological Education (CEFET) in Valença. In 1999 AMABO put together the DESIBO proposal – Sustainable Development of the Island of Boipeba, participating in the Second Congress and International Ecotourism Fair – World ECOTUR 2000 - in Salvador. In 2003 AMABO signed an agreement with SENAC, the National Service for Commercial Learning, setting up classes for professional training. In May and June courses were given for hotel chambermaids, receptionists, waiters and waitresses, and cooks, with 86 villagers participating. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Protecting the Environment |
|||||
|
|||||
Natural Pools |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Community Monitors |
|||||
|
|||||
In March of 2003 tons of fish died in front of the beaches of Guaibim, Morro de São Paulo, Garapuá, Boipeba, Pratigi, and Maraú. These were large fish which live at the bottom of the sea. At the same time, the American company El Paso was drilling with a platform in front of the Island of Boipeba, and the PGS Company was working with seismic shocks between Itacaré and Ilhéus. The two companies were suspected of causing the death of the fish, and were investigated by the public district attorney’s office, Administrative Procedure P.A. No. 05/03. This was to cause real doubt amongst people living in the region about the true impact of these oil-related activities, making apparent the need for more surveillance and monitoring. During puplic hearings for the licensing of the two oil companies PGS and Grant, fisherman and associated groups voiced the need for community participation in the form of a community monitoring group – Mac. The representatives of the Oil and Nuclear Licensing Office ELPN/IBAMA respected the community needs, making mac’s concerns a part of the licensing procedure. |
|||||
|
|||||
Paraffin Spill |
|||||
|
|||||
Material was collected for analysis and it was discovered that the Italian Novamar International SRL ship “Pietro Barbaro” was the culprit. The paraffin had been found from the Islands of Tinharé and Boipeba, to the municipalities of Camamu, Itacaré, and Ilhéus. Petrobras mobilized specialized teams and contracted hundreds of villagers as well as boats and tractors in the region, in order to remove the paraffin. In 10 days, more than 80 tons of paraffin was removed, keeping the natural beauty of the region intact. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
Oil Spill |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
On the 7th and 8th of March Amabo brought the news of this new disaster to the attention of the District’s Environmental Office in Valença, and the CRA. Two fish found dead were frozen for analysis. Both El Paso and PGS were drilling for oil and gas at the time of the disaster. The activities of these companies were suspect in the death of the fish. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
El Paso’s representative spoke about El Paso’s work being developed in the region, and the care taken by the company in protecting the environment. He explained what procedures El Paso adopted in investigating the possible causes of the dying fish, promising a final report in May of 2003. A representative of EVEREST, a company responsible for the study of the environmental impact of PGS’s activities, explained what investigative measures had been taken, promising results of analyses in three to four weeks. Community participants at the hearings became indignant about the repeated ecological disasters, and demanded an ethical and independent investigation of the incident, with consequent indemnifications for damages. El Paso and Everest agreed to pay for the investigative experts provided by the county. These experts would evaluate the studies and research promoted by these companies. It was established that after the reports on the research done by these companies were completed, another public hearing would be set to present as well as discuss, the results which would be made public before the meeting. On the 23rd of September, 2003, another public hearing was held to publicize the results of the investigation. The two challenged companies, El Paso and PGS, presented reports which did not hold the companies responsible for the death of the fish, not presenting any conclusive evidence as to why the fish had died. The district attorney’s office did not discover what caused the disaster. The local population, along with local fishermen, was dissatisfied and disgusted with the results which ignored the importance of the disaster for the community. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
A diver had seen ships positioned near El Paso’s platform, pouring out some smoky or muddy substance. A few days later, divers noticed the substance brought by the currents, which dirtied the water, and then was deposited on the reefs. The substance had a strong odor, and according to the divers, was found to have a yellow color, turning black in contact with algae. |
|||||
|
|||||
Amabo again brought this to the attention of the District Attorney’s Environmental Office as well as IBAMA, and requested efficient environmental control of gas and oil drilling in the region. The community of Boipeba suggests creating a local board for this type of control, so that representatives of the community can accompany these activities and monitor the impact on the environment. |
|||||